Pere Riba vs Daniel Kosakowski Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L L L L
Form
W L W L L W L L W LH2H: Riba 1 - 0 Kosakowski
They have played 2 sets in total, with Riba winning 2 and Kosakowski winning 0. The last match between Riba and Kosakowski was at the Arad Challenger, 05-06-2014, Second, Clay with Pere Riba getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pere Riba | 1 |
| Daniel Kosakowski | 0 |
Arad Challenger(05-06-2014)
6
2
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Riba VS Kosakowski H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Pere Riba
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Riba VS Kosakowski H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:24:45 | Average Match Time | 1:24:45 |
| 60% (30/50) | 1st Serve % | 69% (38/55) |
| 73% (22/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (23/38) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (27/55) | Return Points Win % | 30% (15/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pere Riba Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Pere Riba
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Pere Riba
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dante Gennaro
Player
Pere Riba
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
9
Total Points Won
5
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Pere Riba
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
94
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Martin Cuevas
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Pedro Sorgi
Player
Pere Riba
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
45%
(
41 of
92)
7
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Sabanov
Player
Pere Riba
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
42
Total Points Won
50
|
2-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Pere Riba
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
56
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Samir Iftikhar
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Roy Hobbs
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
6
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Kosakowski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Kosakowski
Player
Ilija Bozoljac
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
81 of
112)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Jr. Bogomolov
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Kosakowski
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (472/332) | Win/Loss | 55% (106/87) |
| 56% (1042/804) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (245/206) |
| 53% (9074/8014) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2194/2098) |
| 48% (32/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (75/57) |
| 61% (432/274) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (30/23) |
| 27% (6/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 20% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2353 | Aces Total | 395 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1024 | Total Double Faults | 226 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 596.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 669.05 |
| 56% (17537/31216) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4390/7234) |
| 72% (12597/17537) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2950/4390) |
| 49% (6693/13679) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1465/2844) |
| 45% (1374/3032) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (253/642) |
| 40% (12378/30947) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2749/7191) |
| 31% (10/22) | Slam W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 54% (13/11) | Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (55/62) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (266/167) | Challenger W/L | 44% (40/50) |
| 65% (128/70) | Futures W/L | 70% (51/22) |
| 61% (461/761) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (104/191) |
| 27% (6/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (106/214) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (35/65) |
| 61% (143/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (31/65) |
| 87% (435/377) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (112/90) |
| 13% (435/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (112/22) |
| 25% (368/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (81/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
